Evidence Hub

Frailty, Multimorbidity, and Polypharmacy: Exploratory Analyses of the Effects of Empagliflozin from the EMPA-KIDNEY Trial

Mayne KJ, Sardell RJ, Staplin N, Judge PK, Zhu D, Sammons E, Cherney DZI, Cheung AK et al.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2024

6,609 participants · 28 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are recommended treatment for adults with CKD, but uncertainty exists regarding their use in patients with frailty and/or multimorbidity, among whom polypharmacy is common. We derived a multivariable logistic regression model to predict hospitalization (reflecting frailty) and assessed empagliflozin's risk–benefit profile in a post hoc analysis of the double-blind, placebo-controlled EMPA-KIDNEY trial.

METHODS: The EMPA-KIDNEY trial randomized 6609 patients with CKD (eGFR ≥20 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, or ≥45 to <90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥200 mg/g) to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg daily or matching placebo and followed them for 2 years (median). Additional characteristics analyzed in subgroups were multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and health-related quality of life at baseline. Cox regression analyses were performed with subgroups defined by approximate thirds of each variable.

RESULTS: The strongest predictors of hospitalization were N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, poor mobility, and diabetes and then eGFR and other comorbidities. Empagliflozin was generally well tolerated independent of predicted risk of hospitalization. In relative terms, allocation to empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death by 28% (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.82) and all-cause hospitalization by 14%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6,609 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free