Evidence Hub

Effect of hyperglycemia and empagliflozin on markers of cardiorenal injury and inflammation in patients with type 1 diabetes

Kugathasan L, Sridhar VS, Lytvyn Y, Lovblom LE, Perkins BA, Advani A, Cherney DZI

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2024

49 participants

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effect of hyperglycemia and empagliflozin on cardiorenal injury and inflammation in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS: Serum cardiac (sST2, Gal-3, cTnT), kidney injury (KIM-1, NGAL), inflammatory (sTNFR1, sTNFR2), and hemodynamic (NT-proBNP, EPO) markers were assessed post-hoc in two separate T1D cohorts. The glycemic clamp trial (NCT02344602) evaluated 49 adults with T1D and 27 controls under euglycemic and acute hyperglycemic conditions. The crossover BETWEEN trial (NCT02632747) investigated empagliflozin 25 mg plus ramipril for 4 weeks compared to placebo-ramipril for 4 weeks in 30 adults with T1D.

RESULTS: In the glycemic clamp study, hyperglycemia acutely increased levels of NT-proBNP (p = 0.0003) and sTNFR2 (p = 0.003). BETWEEN participants treated with empagliflozin exhibited a paradoxical subacute rise in NT-proBNP (p = 0.0147) compared to placebo, independent of hematocrit. Individuals with higher baseline levels of sST2 and sTNFR1 had greater empagliflozin-associated reductions in systolic blood pressure and greater activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) mediators, whereas those with higher baseline levels of KIM-1 and sTNFR1 had greater glomerular filtration rate (GFR) dip.

CONCLUSION: The protective mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibition on blood pressure, RAAS activation, and renal hemodynamics are apparent in the subset of people with uncomplicated T1D with adverse cardiorenal and inflammatory markers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free