Evidence Hub

Association of CYP2C19 Polymorphism With Proton Pump Inhibitors Effectiveness and With Fractures in Real‐Life: Retrospective Cohort Study

Naomi Gronich, Idit Lavi, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Mila Pinchev, Gad Rennert

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2022

12 citations

Abstract

Symptom refractoriness of patients treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might be explained by polymorphism in CYP2C19. This is a retrospective cohort study in which we used the computerized database of Clalit Health Services to compose a cohort from cancer case-control studies' participants that had been genotyped, and that have been dispensed PPI (January 1, 2002 to November 10, 2020). We retrieved demographic and clinical variables on date of PPI initiation (cohort entry), and studies' questionnaires-reported consumption of foods/beverages known to increase peptic-related symptoms. Primary outcome was an abdominal pain diagnosis; secondary outcome was a composite of abdominal pain, visit to a gastroenterology clinic, change to another PPI, PPI dose increase, or metoclopramide prescription, reflecting symptoms persistence/recurrence; in a 2-year follow-up. We also evaluated the association between genetic groups and hip/wrist/spine fractures, in a long-term follow-up. Of 3,326 PPI initiators, there were 66 (2.0%), 739 (22.2%), 1394 (41.9%), 947 (28.5%), and 180 (5.4%) CYP2C19 poor, intermediate, normal, rapid, and ultra-rapid metabolizers, respectively. Being a poor metabolizer was associated with lower risk for the primary outcome, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.91), HR = 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.94); and for the secondary outcome, HR = 0.57 (95% CI 0.38-0.86), HR = 0.58 (95% CI 0.39-0.87), in univariate and multivariable cox regression…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free