Evidence Hub

Relative Bioavailability of Chewable and Conventional Film-Coated Tablet Formulations of Sildenafil 100 mg in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions

Fermín Valenzuela, G. Davila, Y. Ibañez, Luis Garcia, P. Crownover, Regina Gómez-Palacio, J. Ovalle, C. Velasco et al.

Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability, 2011

30 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a chewable tablet formulation of sildenafil citrate 100 mg developed using taste-masking technology and taken with or without water (chewed until full disintegration and then swallowed) versus the conventional film-coated sildenafil tablet (Viagra ® ) taken with water were evaluated in the fasted state in a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 3-period crossover study in 30 healthy men aged 18 to 40 years (mean ± SD, 24±4 y).Sildenafil plasma concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection.Bioequivalence criteria were 90% classic and Westlake CIs within 80% to 125% for test/reference ratios; limit tests applied were Schuirmann unilateral double t test and the Anderson-Hauck test.For area under the curve (AUC), bioequivalence criteria were met for all the treatments studied.For maximum plasma concentration (C max ), bioequivalence criteria were met for the chewable tablet with water relative to Viagra when using the Westlake CI.The chewable tablet without water had equivalent AUC, but the C max was up to 22% lower when compared with Viagra or with the chewable tablet with water.Median time to C max was lowest for the chewable tablet with water (0.75 h) versus Viagra (1.0 h) or the chewable tablet without water (1.75 h).Adverse events with the chewable tablet were consistent with the tolerability profile of Viagra.Only 1 (3%, chewable tablet with water) and 4 (13%,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free