Evidence Hub

Efficacy, tolerability and satisfaction with sildenafil citrate 100‐mg titration compared with continued 50‐mg dose treatment in men with erectile dysfunction

J. Buvat, D. Hatzichristou, M. Maggi, I. Farmer, J. Martínez-Jabaloyas, P. Miller, G. Schnetzler

BJU International, 2008

492 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction after initiating treatment with sildenafil 50 mg and later titrating to 100 mg, compared with continuing treatment with sildenafil 50 mg, in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentre, parallel-group trial was conducted in two 4-week periods. In period 1, patients received 50-mg doses of sildenafil single-blinded for 4 weeks. In period 2, patients were randomized to double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with sildenafil 50 mg or sildenafil 100 mg for 4 weeks. All patients were aged >or=18 years with a documented clinical diagnosis of ED (score of <or=25 on the International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF, Erectile Function, EF, domain), and met the prescribing criteria for sildenafil 50 mg and 100 mg. RESULTS: Of 492 enrolled patients (mean age 53 years, SD 11), 476 (97%) completed period 1 and 473 (96%) completed period 2. Patients receiving sildenafil 50 mg in period 1 had an increase in the mean (SD) baseline EF domain score from 12.8 (5.2) to 22.5 (6.6) (P < 0.001), and improved scores on the Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) and Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SEX-Q). The IIEF EF domain scores were similar in the two groups at baseline and randomization. Patients titrated to the 100-mg dose (237 men) showed a significantly greater improvement than those who continued on the 50-mg dose (240; P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in QEQ and SEX-Q…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 492 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free