Evidence Hub

Clinical application of prognostic factors for patients with organic causes of erectile dysfunction on 100 mg of sildenafil citrate

S. Chia, K. Ramesh, A. Earnest

International journal of urology, 2004

232 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There are still no clinical predictive factors to determine the response rate of erectile dysfunction (ED) patients to sildenefil citrate. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and stratify the risk factors and attempted to determine the prognostic factors in clinical practice to predict the response rate. This is important in improving cost effectiveness and avoiding side-effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an open label prospective study including patients attending the andrology clinic in Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, over 2 years. The patients were evaluated and investigated for possible underlying causes and ED severity was assessed by five-items of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5), together with the duration, degree and rigidity of erection. Psychogenic causes were excluded with a minimal follow up of 6 months. All patients were placed on 100 mg of sildenafil citrate and were reassessed at the end of 6 months. Logistic regression with univariate and multivariate was used as the method of statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were in the cohort. The overall response rate was 43%, with the best response rate in veno-occlusive cases and the worst responses from neurogenic causes. Age, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pretreatment IIEF-5 score, interval to achieve erection and duration of erection were significant in univariate analysis, but only age, smoking and IIEF-5…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 232 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free