Evidence Hub

The utility of CYP3A activity endogenous markers for evaluating drug-drug interaction between sildenafil and CYP3A inhibitors in healthy subjects

Soyoung Lee, Andrew HyoungJin Kim, Sumin Yoon, Jieon Lee, Yu-Jin Lee, Sang-Chun Ji, S. Yoon, SeungHwan Lee et al.

Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 2020

32 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-related drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies are needed during drug development to determine clinical interaction effects. We aimed to evaluate DDI between sildenafil and two CYP3A inhibitors, clarithromycin and itraconazole, regarding the changes in pharmacokinetics and endogenous markers. An open-label, one-sequence, one-period, two-treatment parallel study was conducted in 32 healthy Korean subjects. Each of 16 subjects were randomly assigned to the clarithromycin and itraconazole groups. Both groups received a single dose of sildenafil 25 mg as a control, and either clarithromycin 250 mg or itraconazole 100 mg was administered four times to inhibit CYP3A activity. Pharmacokinetics of sildenafil showed the similar magnitude of inhibitory effects of the two inhibitors on total CYP3A activity; both inhibitors similarly increased systemic exposure of sildenafil by 2-fold. Urinary 6β-OH-cortisone/cortisone and plasma 4β-OH-cholesterol were significantly decreased after clarithromycin administration but not after itraconazole. A significant correlation between sildenafil CL/F and metabolic markers of CYP3A activity was observed after clarithromycin administration. We confirmed that sildenafil has moderate pharmacokinetic interaction with clarithromycin and itraconazole. Endogenous markers well reflected the CYP3A inhibition of clarithromycin, suggesting possible utility in DDI study with moderate to strong CYP3A inhibition; however, there are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 32 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free