Evidence Hub

The Use and Efficacy of Sildenafil in Diabetic Men With Erectile Dysfunction: the Impact on Endothelial Function, a Pilot Feasibility Study

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2007

24 participants

Abstract

* To evaluate the impact of nightly sildenafil vs placebo use on diabetic men with and without proven endothelial dysfunction and coexisting erectile concerns.

* To determine if chronic sildenafil use compared to placebo positively impacts endothelial function among a cohort of diabetic mend with erectile dysfunction

* To assess the salvage rate of sildenafil - failures who demonstrate improved response rates over time with chronic use

* To assess if microalbuminuria predicts flow-mediated dilation (FMD) response

* To measure and identify if other patient specific characteristics predict for sildenafil erectile response and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) response over time (patient specifics; blood pressure, HBA1c, weight, BMI, age IIEF score at baseline)

Conditions: Impotence.

Primary outcome: Determine if PDE5 use over 12 week period in ED diabetic men improves endothelial function as measured by FMD of the brachial artery, as compared to placebo; Assess treatment response to sildenafil over a 12 week period of exposure compared to placebo..

Enrollment: 24 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free