Evidence Hub

Heart failure therapy in patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care (EMPATICC trial)

Anker MS, Mahabadi AA, Totzeck M, Tewes M, Khan MS, Mincu RI, Hendgen-Cotta UB, Michel L et al.

European heart journal, 2026

93 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advanced cancer may resemble a heart failure (HF)-like phenotype marked by cardiac wasting, dyspnoea, congestion, and/or physical dysfunction. The trial evaluated safety and efficacy of HF therapy among patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care to improve patients' self-care ability.

METHODS: Patients with stage 4 solid tumours with a life expectancy of 1-6 months receiving specialized palliative care were enrolled. Patients were required to meet at least two cardiovascular risk criteria and at least one criterion for functional limitation. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive optimized HF therapy (up to four drugs: sacubitril/valsartan, empagliflozin, ivabradine, ferric carboxymaltose) or placebo in a double-blind setting. The primary hierarchical endpoint included: (i) days alive and able to wash oneself, (ii) ability to walk 4 m, and (iii) self-reported patient global assessment (PGA) of subjective well-being, during the 30-day placebo-controlled phase.

RESULTS: In five centres, 93 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint did not differ between groups (win ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.58; P = .83). Overall, mortality was 32% at 30 days (not different between groups). In patients alive at 30 days, HF therapy reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels by 41% (P = .040), increased left ventricular ejection fraction by 2.9% (P = .036), and improved PGA scores (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 93 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free