Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy of Sildenafil therapy in children with pulmonary hypertension

Ageliki Karatza, Andrew Bush, Alan G. Magee

International Journal of Cardiology, 2005

130 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sildenafil is a selective Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that has been reported to be a potent pulmonary vasodilator. We evaluated the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of oral Sildenafil in a case series of children with pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS: Three children, 1 with primary pulmonary hypertension (patient 1) and 2 with pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (patients 2 and 3) were enrolled. Sildenafil was started at 0.5 mg/kg 4-hourly and the dose increased to 1.0 and then to 2.0 mg/kg/dose. Patients were assessed at baseline and then monthly for a total of 6 visits.

RESULTS: All patients reported increased exercise capacity with improvement in New York Heart Association functional class. The distance walked during the 6-min test increased by 74% (patient 1), 75% (patient 2) and 25% (patient 3) and oxyhaemoglobin saturations increased from 79%, 97% and 80% to 93%, 100% and 93%, respectively. There were no side effects and no fall in systemic blood pressure. Sildenafil plasma levels 1 h after a 0.5, 1.0 and 2 mg/kg dose of Sildenafil were 109+/-87, 150+/-62 and 368+/-200 ng/ml, respectively. They fell to 211+/-106 ng/ml 3 h after the 2.0 mg/kg dose.

CONCLUSIONS: Medium term Sildenafil therapy improves oxyhaemoglobin saturations and exercise tolerance in children with pulmonary hypertension without any side effects. Mean plasma levels 1 h after doses of 0.5-2.0 mg/kg are similar to the maximum plasma concentrations reported in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free