Evidence Hub

Efficacy and optimal dose of sildenafil in primary pulmonary hypertension

Anand Chockalingam, Ganesan Gnanavelu, S. Venkatesan, Satheesh Elangovan, V. Jagannathan, T. Subramaniam, Ramdas Alagesan, Smrita Dorairajan

International Journal of Cardiology, 2004

15 participants · 72 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the effects of sildenafil and evaluate optimal dosing in primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). Sildenafil selectively inhibits phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5), which is abundant in pulmonary and penile tissue. This results in increasing nitric oxide (NO) at tissue level leading to pulmonary vasodilatation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Our study was a prospective study of sildenafil in 15 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic PPH of NYHA class III-IV. All patients were stabilized for a minimum period of 5 days with antifailure medications. Sildenafil was started at 50 mg twice daily for 4 weeks and increased to 100 mg bid for 4 more weeks in a step-up protocol. Primary end-points were change in Borg dyspnea index, NYHA class and 6-min walk distance, estimated at baseline 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks.

RESULTS: NYHA class (baseline 3.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 4 weeks 2.4 +/- 0.5, p = 0.002), Borg dyspnea index (8.1 +/- 1.7 vs. 4.4 +/- 1.9, p = 0.0007), 6-min walk distance (234 +/- 44 vs. 377 +/- 128 m, p = 0.001) and Pulmonary artery pressure (125 +/- 15 vs. 113 +/- 18 mm Hg p = 0.05) are significantly improved with sildenafil 50 mg bid at 4 weeks. Increasing the dose to 100 mg bid did not produce further benefit. Echocardiography parameters of right heart dimensions and functions did not change markedly in the study period.

CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is well tolerated with no adverse effects in severe pulmonary hypertension. It reduces symptoms, improves effort tolerance and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free