Evidence Hub

Impact of Simultaneous Initiation of Finerenone and Empagliflozin on Albuminuria Irrespective of Baseline HbA1c Levels: A Participant-Level Exploratory Analysis of the Randomised CONFIDENCE Trial

McGill JB, Green JB, Heerspink HJL, Mann JFE, Mottl AK, Rosenstock J, Rossing P, Vaduganathan M et al.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

800 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims: This prespecified analysis evaluated whether the safety and efficacy of finerenone and a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) combination vary by baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c).

Materials and methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 100 - 2 and HbA1c < 11% (< 97 mmol/mol) were randomised (1:1:1) to once-daily finerenone, empagliflozin or combination. Primary outcome was UACR change from baseline at Day 180.

Results: Baseline HbA1c was available for 781/800 CONFIDENCE participants; baseline HbA1c and eGFR mean values (standard deviation) were 7.3% (1.2%) and 54.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (17.1 mL/min/1.73 m2). At Day 180, HbA1c decreased with combination therapy and empagliflozin (both least-squares mean change -0.1% [95% confidence interval -0.2, -0.0]), with no change with finerenone. In total, 212, 190, 188 and 191 participants were included in HbA1c Quartiles 1 (HbA1c ≤ 6.4% [≤ 46 mmol/mol]), 2 (HbA1c > 6.4 and ≤ 7.1% [> 46 and ≤ 54 mmol/mol]), 3 (HbA1c > 7.1 and ≤ 7.9% [> 54 and ≤ 63 mmol/mol]) and 4 (HbA1c > 7.9% [> 63 mmol/mol]), respectively. Change from baseline in HbA1c at Day 180 was greatest in Quartile 4. At Day 180, combination therapy reduced UACR from baseline in all HbA1c quartiles to a greater extent than either monotherapy (mean [95% CI] -53% [-63, -42], -47% [-57, -34], -63% [-70, -54] and -55% [-65, -42], in Quartiles 1-4, respectively).

Conclusion: Simultaneous initiation with finerenone and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 800 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free