Evidence Hub

Abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg for atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jun-Qing Wang, Yuan-Juan Yang, Haitao Yang, Xiaojuan Fu

Advances in Dermatology and Allergology, 2022

200 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction It is elusive to compare the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg once daily in patients with atopic dermatitis. Aim This meta-analysis aims to explore the influence of abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg on the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Material and methods Several databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library were systematically searched through July 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of abrocitinib 100 mg versus 200 mg for patients with atopic dermatitis. Results Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with abrocitinib 100 mg for atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib 200 mg had a remarkably positive impact on IGA response (OR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.39–2.28; p < 0.00001), EASI-75 (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.60–2.57; p < 0.00001), NRS response (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.27–3.08; p = 0.003), and adverse events (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.11–1.84; p = 0.005), but it showed no obvious influence on serious adverse events (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.25–1.37; p = 0.22). Conclusions Abrocitinib 200 mg is better than abrocitinib 100 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free