Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of fezolinetant and elinzanetant for vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

H. D. de Oliveira, C. A. V. Diaz, L. Barbosa, Victor Hugo Palhares Flávio-Reis, F. Zamora, Osvaldo Gonçalves Barbosa

Maturitas, 2025

4,663 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S)

Menopause, marked by a decline in estrogen, leads to disruptive vasomotor symptoms like hot flashes and night sweats, significantly affecting quality of life. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant and elinzanetant, two neurokinin 3 receptor antagonists, in managing vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Data sources were identified by searches in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to September 2024. The study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, with the risk of bias assessed using the version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials and evidence quality was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.4.1.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 4663 patients were included in the analysis. Elinzanetant >100 mg and fezolinetant ≤45 mg were the most effective doses for reducing vasomotor symptom frequency and severity. Fezolinetant (MD = -1.38) and elinzanetant (MD = -2.04) achieved ≥50 % reductions in vasomotor symptom frequency, with a greater effect in the elinzanetant group. Additionally, elinzanetant improved menopause-specific quality of life. However, higher doses of both drugs were associated with increased adverse effects, with elinzanetant demonstrating a more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,663 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free