Evidence Hub

SGLT2 Inhibitor on Infarct Size and LV Remodeling by CMR in Patients With AMI.

Choi KH, Lee SH, Kim SM, Hong D, Lee SY, Lee JM, Park TK, Yang JH et al.

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2026

200 participants

Abstract

Background: Although recent large-scale randomized trials have demonstrated that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are safe, the mechanisms underlying their potential cardioprotective effects remain poorly understood.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy on myocardial injury and left ventricular (LV) remodeling in AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Methods: In this prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial, patients ≥18 years of age at high risk for heart failure after successful PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or not. The primary endpoint was infarct size (% LV mass) assessed by CMR at 6-month follow-up. The coprimary endpoint was a difference in LV end-systolic volume measured by CMR between baseline and 6 months (ΔLV end-systolic volume).

Results: A total of 200 patients underwent randomization, with 100 assigned to the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 100 assigned to the control group. CMR assessments for 6 months were available for 169 patients (84.0%) of the total study population (89 patients in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 80 patients in the control group). Compared with control, SGLT2 inhibition did not reduce infarct size (% LV mass) at 6-month follow-up (SGLT2 inhibitor vs control, 12.5% [8.5%-20.9%] vs 12.9% [5.0%-20.7%]; P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free