Evidence Hub

Relationship between caffeine intake and small for gestational age and preterm birth: a dose-response meta-analysis

Mohammadreza Askari, Elham Bazshahi, Nastran Payande, Tofigh Mobaderi, Noushin Fahimfar, L. Azadbakht

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2023

8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Our meta-analysis aimed to determine the dose-response relationship between caffeine intake and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PB). A systematic search of PubMed, Web of science and Scopus was done from inception to January 2023 using relevant keywords. All case-control and cohort studies reported in English were included if the exposure of interest was caffeine intake during pregnancy, the outcome of interest was spontaneous SGA and PB, and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios were provided or could be calculated. In all, 22 studies (15 cohort studies and seven case-control studies) were included in this review. Examining the association of caffeine intake with risk of PB, no significant relationship was found (Pooled ES: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.14, P = 0.019). Findings from this meta-analysis demonstrated that caffeine intake had a significantly higher risk of SGA respectively (Pooled ES: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.41, P < 0.001). A dose-response analysis proposed that an increase of 100 mg caffeine per day was associated with a 13% greater risk of SGA. This study confirmed that caffeine intake raises the risk of SGA. However, the risk of PB was not found to be reliably associated with maternal caffeine consumption.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free