Evidence Hub

Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) following acute myocardial infarction: effects of empagliflozin and association with heart failure readouts in the EMMY trial

Hassan AM, Aziz F, Tripolt NJ, Herrmann M, Sourij H, von Lewinski D

Scientific reports, 2025

Abstract

Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) is increasingly recognized as a biomarker in heart failure (HF). However, its response to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains insufficiently explored. In this study, CA125 levels were measured from plasma samples collected in the EMMY trial, and robust linear mixed-effects models (R-LMEMs) were applied to assess the effects of empagliflozin on CA125 levels, their changes over a 26-week period, and their associations with established HF biomarkers. Our analysis showed that empagliflozin had no statistically significant effect on log-transformed CA125 levels. CA125 exhibited minor fluctuations at 6 weeks before declining at 26 weeks to a level below baseline, which had been measured shortly after AMI. Log-transformed CA125 was significantly associated with log-transformed N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and multiple echocardiographic parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, and volumes (LVEDD, LVEDV, LVESD, LVESV), and the ratio of early diastolic transmitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e'). Notably, CA125's associations with NT-proBNP and E/e' were modified by empagliflozin. In conclusion, although CA125 showed significant associations with established HF biomarkers, it did not exhibit a parallel response to empagliflozin after AMI.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free