Evidence Hub

Systematic review of suspended sediment effects on aquatic organisms across taxa, developmental stages, and endpoints

S. Park, Jung-Ho Lee, Yujung Byeon, J. Khim

Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2025

10 citations

Abstract

Suspended sediment (SS) is a key stressor in aquatic ecosystems, and numerous experimental studies have investigated its biological effects across various taxa and endpoints. In this systematic review, we analyzed 76 experimental studies to evaluate how SS effects differ across taxonomic groups, developmental stages, exposure durations, and biological endpoints, while also identifying trends in sediment-specific parameters. Sublethal thresholds for fish and bivalves were often below 100 mg L-1, whereas phytoplankton were typically exposed to concentrations exceeding 1000 mg L-1. Although physiological indicators were commonly applied, mortality and growth were the most frequently reported endpoints. Only 4 % of studies performed chemical analyses, 29 % reported particle size data, and none assessed particle structure. While all studies used natural sediments, 17 % included non-natural particles such as kaolin or volcanic ash. These findings underscore the need to integrate sediment-specific properties into SS toxicity assessments to enhance ecological relevance and support the development of robust sediment quality guidelines.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free