Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Interceptor® G2 Long-Lasting Insecticidal Net Against Pyrethroid-Resistant Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae s.l.: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hassan M. Alzain, Hassan A. Alkhunaizi

International journal of research and review, 2025

Abstract

Background: Malaria is a major public health issue, primarily in sub-Saharan Africa, where long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have been compromised by pyrethroid-resistant vectors of the Anopheles gambiae s.l. complex. Interceptor® G2 is a new generation alternative that is defined as a dual-insecticide LLIN with alpha-cypermethrin (100 mg/m²) and chlorfenapyr (200 mg/m²) where target-resistant vectors are killed due to a novel mode of action. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the entomological efficacy of Interceptor G2 under Phase II WHOPES experimental hut trials.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for articles published between January 1991 and July 2025. Eligible studies were English Phase II WHOPES trials of Interceptor® G2, unwashed and washed 20 times, against pyrethroid-resistant An. gambiae s.l. Comparator arm controls were untreated nets, nets treated solely for chlorfenapyr, and standard Interceptor® (alpha-cypermethrin-only) nets. 72-hour lethality of mosquitoes, blood-feeding inhibition, and mosquito exit were key outcomes. Risk of bias assessment used ROBINS-I. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model (DerSimonian–Laird).

Results: Six studies were included, with study locations in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Tanzania. Interceptor® G2 (unwashed) had an edge on 72-hour mortality (OR = 47.29; 95% CI: 28.5–78.44) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free