Evidence Hub

Abelson Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease and Lewy Body Dementia: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression

Giovanni Gosch Berton, Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Rafael dos Santos Borges, Nicole Rodrigues Cardoso, Thiago Abrahão de Oliveira, Marcos Vinícius Oliveira Marques

Clinical neuropharmacology, 2024

197 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background Alpha-synucleinopathies are incurable neurodegenerative diseases. Abelson tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Abl TKIs) may be disease-modifying therapies. This systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression evaluated the use of Abl TKIs in their treatment. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for trials using Abl TKIs in patients with Parkinson's disease and Lewy body dementia published until July 2023. The outcome was the change in the MDS-UPDRS-III (Movement Disorder Society–Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III). DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect estimates. Leave-one-out forest plots were used for the sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression (restricted maximum likelihood) was performed. Results Five studies (197 patients) were included. Nilotinib 300 mg had an effect size of −1.154 (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.000 to 0.692). Nilotinib 150 mg and bosutinib 100 mg versus placebo yielded 0.82 (95% CI, −3.76 to 5.41). Sensitivity analysis showed that 1 trial changed the significance of the nilotinib 300 mg single-arm analysis (MD = −1.723; 95% CI, −2.178 to −1.268). Meta-regression revealed that lower age (EC = −0.9103, SE = 0.2286, P < 0.0001) and higher baseline MDS-UPDRS-III scores (EC = 0.1210, SE = 0.0168, P < 0.0001) could explain the inefficacy of nilotinib 300 mg. Conclusions Nilotinib (300 mg) proved effective postsensitivity analysis, unlike lower…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 197 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free