Evidence Hub

Impact of Baseline GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use on Albuminuria Reduction and Safety With Simultaneous Initiation of Finerenone and Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CONFIDENCE Trial)

Agarwal R, Green JB, Heerspink HJL, Mann JFE, McGill JB, Mottl AK, Nangaku M, Rosenstock J et al.

Diabetes care, 2025

800 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Objective: The CONFIDENCE trial demonstrated additive benefits of simultaneous initiation of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor compared with monotherapy in reducing the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). This prespecified analysis evaluated whether safety and efficacy of combination therapy varies by baseline glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use.

Research design and methods: Adults with chronic kidney disease (UACR ≥100 to <5,000 mg/g; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30-90 mL/min/1.73 m2) and type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin <11% [97 mmol/mol]) were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily finerenone, empagliflozin, or finerenone plus empagliflozin.

Results: Among 800 participants, 182 (23%) used a GLP-1 RA at baseline. At day 180, UACR change from baseline in participants using a GLP-1 RA was -51% (95% CI -59 to -40%) with combination therapy, -34% (-48 to -18%) with finerenone, and -36% (-48 to -21%) with empagliflozin. Corresponding results in those not using a GLP-1 RA at baseline were -56% (-62 to -50%), -37% (-45 to -28%), and -33% (-41 to -23%), respectively. Hyperkalemia incidence rates with combination therapy were 9.0% and 9.5% among individuals with and without baseline GLP-1 RA use. eGFR changes were consistent among individuals with and without baseline GLP-1 RA use. Acute kidney injury was uncommon. Decreases in systolic blood pressure were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 800 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free