Evidence Hub

Rapid Inpatient Methadone Induction in the Fentanyl Era: A Systematic Review of Safety, Efficacy, and Protocols for Hospitalized Patients with Opioid Use Disorder

Lorik Berisha, Sapan Patel, Charlotte Pirquet, N. Kumar, Yousef Soliman, Ahsan Ullah, D. Matassa

Current Addiction Report, 2026

380 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

The potency of illicit fentanyl has rendered standard methadone inductions inadequate for many hospitalized adults with opioid use disorder. Standard protocols often fail to achieve therapeutic doses quickly enough to manage withdrawal and cravings in fentanyl-tolerant individuals, contributing to poor retention and higher self-discharge rates. This review examines emerging evidence on dosing strategies, outcomes, and safety of rapid methadone inductions in acute-care hospitals. Nine studies (five retrospective cohorts, four case series/reports) encompassing 380 patients met inclusion criteria. Median starting doses were 30–40 mg (range 20–90 mg), with daily or symptom-triggered increases achieving 60–100 mg within 5–7 days—substantially faster than outpatient schedules. Sedation occurred in 6.4% of patients, while severe sedation requiring naloxone or ICU transfer was rare (0.4%). No in-hospital deaths, malignant arrhythmias, or torsades de pointes were reported. The only study assessing post-discharge outcomes found no overdoses within 30 days. Rapid titration improved retention, with self-discharge against medical advice ranging from 4 to 19% overall and significantly lower among pregnant patients than with slower titration (23.0% vs. 37.9%). Pregnant individuals, those with infections, and polysubstance users tolerated rapid induction without excess adverse events. Observational data suggest that rapid inpatient methadone titration can safely and effectively reach…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 380 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free