Evidence Hub

Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Metformin/Empagliflozin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study

Lei Y, Yi Q, Ji S, Lu J, Yang Z

Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2026

56 participants

Abstract

This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters-Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞-with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the Cmax of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC0-∞) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free