Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin in De Novo vs Acute Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure: A Prespecified Analysis From EMPULSE

Angermann CE, Gerhardt T, Blatchford JP, Biegus J, Collins SP, Kosiborod M, Ferreira JP, Nassif ME et al.

JACC. Heart failure, 2026

355 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: In EMPULSE (A Study to Test the Effect of Empagliflozin in Patients Who Are in Hospital for Acute Heart Failure), the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin improved clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF).

Objectives: This prespecified analysis examined efficacy, safety, and tolerability of empagliflozin in subgroups with de novo heart failure (NHF) vs acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

Methods: After stabilization, participants were randomized 1:1 to empagliflozin 10 mg/d or placebo, stratified by HF status (NHF: n = 175; ADHF: n = 355). The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite of death, worsening HF, or ≥5-point difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) change at day 90, assessed using a win ratio.

Results: Participants with NHF were younger, had fewer comorbidities, had higher blood pressure and heart rate, and better KCCQ-TSS. Prescription of diuretic agents was similar between subgroups. The win ratio was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.89-1.89) for NHF and 1.39 (95% CI: 1.07-1.81) for ADHF (Pinteraction = 0.759). There were no interactions between NHF and ADHF for the primary endpoint, its components, or secondary endpoints, except diuretic response, which was greater with empagliflozin in NHF than in ADHF from day 15 (mean difference vs placebo: -5.11 [Q1-Q3: -7.89 to -2.32] vs -0.97 [Q1-Q3: -2.91 to 0.96] kg per mean daily loop diuretic dose, Pinteraction = 0.017), with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 355 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free