Evidence Hub

Heart failure outcomes and empagliflozin effects in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation: Data from EMPEROR-Reduced

Böhm M, Butler J, Abdin A, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Brueckmann M, Ofstad AP et al.

European journal of heart failure, 2025

1,857 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims: Empagliflozin reduces cardiovascular death (CVD) or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), slows estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and improves quality of life (QoL) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Whether the effect of empagliflozin is consistent according to atrial fibrillation (AF) status is worth exploring.

Methods and results: The impact of AF versus sinus rhythm (SR) on outcomes as well as on eGFR decline and QoL were studied post-hoc in EMPEROR-Reduced. Of patients with available rhythm analyses and after exclusion of patients with missing or paced rhythms, 2785 were included (AF, n = 928, SR, n = 1857). Differences were not significant for the primary endpoint (p = 0.66), first (p = 0.19) and recurrent HHF (p = 0.45). On placebo, alcohol consumption (interaction p = 0.32), body mass index (interaction p = 0.93), diabetes (interaction p = 0.52), hypertension (interaction p = 0.24) were not different between AF and SR. Low ejection fraction and high Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) class had higher event rates but without interaction between SR and AF, respectively. After a median follow-up of 20 months, empagliflozin reduced CVD or HHF compared to placebo in AF and SR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.08; and HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.84; interaction p = 0.29). The same applied to time to first HHF (interaction p = 0.20), while there was a borderline but insignificant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 1,857 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free