Evidence Hub

Chronic Inhibition of cGMP phosphodiesterase 5A improves diabetic cardiomyopathy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial using magnetic resonance imaging with myocardial tagging

E. Giannetta, A. Isidori, N. Galea, I. Carbone, E. Mandosi, C. Vizza, F. Naro, S. Morano et al.

Circulation, 2012

172 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: cGMP phosphodiesterase type 5 protein is upregulated in myocardial hypertrophy. However, it has never been ascertained whether phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition exerts an antiremodeling effect in nonischemic heart disease in humans. We explored the cardioreparative properties of a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, in a model of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-nine diabetic men (60.3 ± 7.4 years) with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging consistent with nonischemic, nonfailing diabetic cardiomyopathy (reduced circumferential strain [σ], -12.6 ± 3.1; increased left ventricular [LV] torsion [θ], 18.4 ± 4.6°; and increased ratio of LV mass to volume, 2.1 ± 0.5 g/mL) were randomized to receive sildenafil or placebo (100 mg/d). At baseline, the metabolic indices were correlated with torsion, strain, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, vascular endothelial growth factor, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and blood pressure. After 3 months, sildenafil produced a significant improvement compared with placebo in LV torsion (Δθ: sildenafil, -3.89 ± 3.11° versus placebo, 2.13 ± 2.35°; P<0.001) and strain (Δσ: sildenafil, -3.30 ± 1.86 versus placebo, 1.22 ± 1.84; P<0.001). Sildenafil-induced improvement of LV contraction was accompanied by consistent changes in chamber geometry and performance, with a 6.5 ± 11 improvement in mass-to-volume ratio over placebo (P=0.021). Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and transforming growth…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free