Evidence Hub

Addition of sildenafil citrate for treatment of severe intrauterine growth restriction: a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial

Nesreen A. A. Shehata, Hamada A. A. Ali, A. Fahim, Maha A. Katta, G. Hussein

Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2018

46 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background: Severe intrauterine growth restriction complicates approximately 0.4% of the pregnancies. It increases the risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Subjects and methods: A double blind placebo controlled trial was conducted in Beni Suef University hospitals during 2017. It included 46 pregnant women with severe intrauterine growth restriction. Women were randomly allocated into two groups each included 23 patients. Intervention group received sildenafil citrate 20 mg orally three times a day, in addition to fish oil and zinc supplementation. Control group received tablets similar to sildenafil and the same treatment as intervention group. Primary outcomes included improvement in umbilical and middle cerebral arteries pulsatility indices and abdominal circumference. Results: Umbilical and middle cerebral arteries Doppler indices showed significant difference between groups after intake of sildenafil. Umbilical artery pulsatility index decreased significantly (p value = .001) while middle cerebral artery pulsatility index increased significantly in intervention group (p value0.001). Moreover, abdominal circumference growth velocity improved after two weeks of sildenafil intake (p value = .001). Conclusions: Sildenafil citrate may improve uteroplacental and fetal cerebral perfusion in pregnancies complicated by severe intrauterine growth restriction. It also improves abdominal circumference growth velocity. A wide scale randomized trials are needed for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free