Evidence Hub

Treatment of intracorporeal injection nonresponse with sildenafil alone or in combination with triple agent intracorporeal injection therapy

McMahon CG, Samali R, Johnson H

The Journal of urology, 1999

93 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assess the efficacy of sildenafil as salvage therapy for intracorporeal injection therapy nonresponse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 93 patients with a mean age of 53.6 years (range 24 to 77) with chronic erectile dysfunction. In all cases a home trial of intracavernosal injection of high dose alprostadil and triple agent intracavernosal injection therapy had failed. Patients were treated with sildenafil citrate alone or in combination with intracavernosal injection therapy.

RESULTS: The etiology of erectile dysfunction was arteriogenic in 29 cases, cavernosal venous leakage in 36, mixed vasculogenic in 24, psychogenic in 3 and post-priapism intracavernous fibrosis in 1. Of the 32 sildenafil responders (34% of the study group) 30 required 100 and 2 required 50 mg. The 29 sildenafil intracavernosal injection (combined therapy) responders (31% of the study group) required 100 mg. sildenafil. There were 32 nonresponders (34% of the study group). Mean International Index of Erectile Function questions 3 and 4 scores were 1.7 and 1.5 at baseline, 2.3 and 1.9 with intracavernosal injection, 4.6 and 42.2 with sildenafil, and 4.1 and 4.10 with combined therapy, respectively. Of the 93 patients 29 (31%) treated with intracavernosal injection reported adverse effects, including penile pain in 27, dizziness in 5 and headache in 2. Of the patients treated with sildenafil 34 (37%) reported side effects, including headache in 30, facial flushing in 25,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 93 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free