Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of empagliflozin in paediatric patients aged 10-17 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Rascher J, Cheng S, Johnston C, Härtter S, Jan-Georg W, Marquard J, Tartakovsky I, Laffel LMB

British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025

103 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Aims: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) regarding glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) lowering using the paediatric data from DINAMO and to assess differences compared with adults.

Methods: Population PK and PK/PD models previously developed for empagliflozin in adults and adolescents were re-estimated in a Bayesian framework. The PK model included 223 observations from 74 patients receiving empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg and the PK/PD model used 394 observations from 103 patients receiving empagliflozin (n = 52) or placebo (n = 51).

Results: Empagliflozin PK was well described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero-order and first-order absorption, with tested covariate effects of sex, age, race and estimated glomerular filtration rate on apparent clearance, and fixed allometric exponents on apparent clearance, apparent central volume of distribution, apparent intercompartmental clearance and apparent peripheral volume of distribution. Simulations of area under the curve at steady state (AUCss) demonstrated that adult and paediatric subjects exhibit similar AUCss. The PK/PD data were adequately described by a turnover model with disease progression and AUCss inhibiting the HbA1c synthesis through an inhibitory maximum effect relationship. Simulations showed that the placebo-adjusted HbA1c decrease at Week 26 in the paediatric population was larger than that in the adult population (-0.699 vs. -0.528%).

Conclusion: A Bayesian…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 103 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free