Evidence Hub

Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the Polypill for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (POLY-HF) Trial

Keshvani N, Rizvi SK, Khashami F, Jain AK, Coellar JD, Bustillo-Rubio M, Yaros K, Thibodeau JT et al.

Journal of cardiac failure, 2026

212 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Despite the efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), real-world utilization remains suboptimal. Polypill strategies have been trialed for the prevention of atherosclerotic conditions but not in HF.

Methods: The Polypill for Heart Failure (POLY-HF) trial was a 2-center, open-label randomized clinical trial conducted within a safety-net health care system and at a university hospital in Dallas, Texas (NCT04633005). Eligible participants were adults with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%) not receiving target dose GDMT. Participants were randomized 1:1 to once-daily overencapsulated polypill with multiple dose formulations (metoprolol succinate 25/50/100/150 mg, spironolactone 12.5 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg) vs enhanced usual care with individual GDMTs coordinated with outpatient cardiology/primary care. The primary endpoint was LVEF at 6 months adjusted for baseline, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and the secondary endpoints included a hierarchical composite win-ratio-based endpoint and changes in quality of life, adherence assessed by therapeutic drug monitoring, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

Results: The study enrolled 212 participants (108 polypill, 104 usual care). The median age of the study population was 54 years, with 54% of participants of self-reported Black race and 33% of self-reported Hispanic ethnicity.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 212 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free