Evidence Hub

A phase 2A/B randomized trial of metabolic modulators intranasal insulin and empagliflozin for MCI and early AD.

Erichsen JM, Register TC, Sutphen C, Ma D, Gaussoin SA, Rudolph M, Rundle M, Bateman JT et al.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Agents targeting metabolic/vascular disorders are promising candidates to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD) and enhance safety and efficacy of other therapies.

Methods: In a 2×2 factorial double-blinded randomized trial, participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), early AD, or who were amyloid positive received intranasal insulin (INI; 40 IU q.i.d.), the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin (10 mg q.d. oral tablet), both, or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Secondary outcomes included the modified Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite-5 (mPACC5), fluid biomarkers, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and fractional anisotropy (FA).

Results: TRAEs were mild and similar for all groups. INI increased mPACC5, modulated FA and CBF, and reduced plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein. Empagliflozin lowered cerebrospinal fluid tau and modulated CBF. Both agents moderated immune/inflammatory/neurovascular markers.

Discussion: INI and empagliflozin treatment was safe with promising effects on cognition, fluid, and imaging biomarkers. A longer and larger trial is needed to confirm these results.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05081219 HIGHLIGHTS: Agents targeting metabolic or vascular disorders are promising candidates to prevent or treat Alzheimer's disease (AD). Intranasal insulin and empagliflozin were safe alone or in combination for mild cognitive impairment/AD. Insulin improved cognition and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free