Doravirine/Islatravir (100/0.75 mg) Once-Daily Compared With Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide as Initial HIV-1 Treatment: 48-Week Results From a Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial
Abstract
Abstract Background Doravirine/islatravir is an investigational regimen that is being studied for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) treatment. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04233879), previously untreated adults with HIV-1 were randomized (1:1) and stratified by HIV-1 RNA (≤/>100 000 copies/mL) and CD4 count (</≥200 cells/µL) to doravirine/islatravir (100/0.75 mg) or bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (50/200/25 mg) orally once-daily (primary endpoint: percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot, 10% noninferiority margin). Results Overall, 597 participants were treated; enrollment stopped early due to decreases in CD4 and lymphocyte counts observed in other islatravir studies. Doravirine/islatravir was noninferior to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: 265 of 298 (88.9%) versus 264 of 299 (88.3%) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference, 0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −4.7, 5.6). Mean change from baseline in CD4 count was +182 and +234 cells/µL (difference, −50; 95% CI: −79, −21) with doravirine/islatravir versus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide. Mean change in lymphocyte count was 0.01 and 0.21 × 109/L (difference, −0.20; 95% CI: −0.30, −0.10). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 90.6% and 87.3% of participants, with coronavirus disease 2019 being most common (14.1%, 16.4%). Treatment-related AEs were…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 597 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Drug repositioning: a brief overview
- Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in Drosophila melanogaster
- Time-resolved in silico modeling of fine-tuned cAMP signaling in platelets: feedback loops, titrated phosphorylations and pharmacological modulation
- Current View on Green Tea Catechins Formulations, Their Interactions with Selected Drugs, and Prospective Applications for Various Health Conditions
- In silico Structure-based Identification of Novel Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors Against Alzheimer’s Disease
- Development and In Vitro Evaluation of Controlled Release Viagra® Containing Poloxamer-188 Using Gastroplus™ PBPK Modeling Software for In Vivo Predictions and Pharmacokinetic Assessments
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.