Evidence Hub

High-dose intravenous versus oral iron in blood donors with iron deficiency: The IronWoMan randomized, controlled clinical trial

Camilla Drexler, S. Macher, Ines Lindenau, M. Holter, Martina Moritz, T. Stojaković, T. Pieber, P. Schlenke et al.

Clinical Nutrition, 2020

137 participants · 33 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Frequent blood donation often leads to iron deficiency and even anemia but appropriate strategies for detection and prevention are currently not mandatory. At the Medical University of Graz, we conducted a single-center prospective clinical trial to compare oral and IV iron supplementation in iron deficient blood donors including Austrian regular whole blood and platelet apheresis donors. We aimed to determine the difference of transferrin saturation between the treatment groups 8-12 weeks iron administration besides other parameters of iron status and blood count.

METHODS

176 healthy male and female blood donors with iron deficiency (ferritin ≤30 ng/mL) were randomized to either a single dose of IV ferric carboxymaltose (1000 mg, n = 86) or oral iron (II)fumarate (100 tablets of 100 mg [10 per week], n = 90).

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2016, 172 donors (137 women) completed the study; 4 in the oral group were lost to follow-up. At follow-up, median (IQR) transferrin saturation and ferritin were significantly higher in the intravenous group (27 [23-35]%, vs 21.0 [16-32]%; p < 0.001 and 105 [75-145] ng/mL vs 25 [17-34] ng/mL; p < 0.001, respectively) while median (IQR) hemoglobin levels were comparable (IV, 13.6 [13.0-14.4] g/dL vs oral, 13.6 [13.0-14.2] g/dL). The frequency of adverse effects was comparable (38% in both groups) and no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of 1000 mg of intravenous iron is highly effective to counteract…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 137 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free