Evidence Hub

Sildenafil citrate improves erectile function and lower urinary tract symptoms independent of baseline body mass index or LUTS severity

McVary KT, Siegel RL, Carlsson M

Urology, 2008

189 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the body mass index (BMI) and lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) severity on treatment response to sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and moderate to severe LUTS associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS: A post hoc analysis of data from a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sildenafil (50 mg once daily titrated to 100 mg once daily) was conducted. The BMI categories were obese (> or = 30 kg/m(2)), overweight (> or = 25 to or = 12. The maximal urinary flow rate was determined by uroflowmetry.

RESULTS: Patients receiving sildenafil (n = 189) had a significant improvement in the erectile function domain scores of the International Index of Erectile Function (P < .0001 vs placebo, n = 180), which did not vary across BMI groups. A greater improvement in LUTS score was observed with sildenafil compared with placebo for men with severe LUTS (-8.6 vs -2.4, P < .0001) than in men with moderate LUTS (-3.6 vs -1.7, P = .06). Also, the improvement in LUTS scores was significant (P < or = .02) for men taking sildenafil independent of BMI (obese, -8.9 vs -5.4; overweight, -7.3 vs -3.2; normal weight, -7.1 vs -0.84). No difference was found among the treatment groups in the change from baseline maximal urinary flow rate across all LUTS and BMI categories (range 4.5 to -4.2 mL/s).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that daily dosing with sildenafil improved ED and LUTS independent of baseline LUTS severity or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 189 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free