Evidence Hub

Canagliflozin attenuates CMR-quantified myocardial fibrosis in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk: a randomised open-label controlled trial

Yan H, Liu J, Zhang Z, Chen S, Chang X, Jin H, Li X, Chen Y et al.

Diabetologia, 2026

67 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We aimed to investigate canagliflozin's effects on myocardial fibrosis, cardiac structure and function, and microcirculation in high-cardiovascular-risk type 2 diabetes mellitus through cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) quantification, while investigating the cardiovascular protective mechanisms of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

Methods: This open-label parallel RCT recruited 45 high-risk participants (18-75 years) with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 53.0-91.3 mmol/mol [7.0-10.5%]) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50% from the Endocrinology Outpatient Clinic of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (August 2022 to November 2024). Participants were 1:1 randomised via a computer-generated sequence through the centralised iClinicalStation system (allocation concealed, performed by independent personnel not involved in outcome assessment). They received canagliflozin 100 mg/day (n=23) or sitagliptin 100 mg/day (n=22) for 26 weeks. Consistent with the open-label design, participants and care providers were aware of treatment assignments; however, outcome assessors (radiologists, sonographers) and data analysts remained blinded to group allocation to minimise bias. The primary endpoint was CMR-quantified extracellular volume (ECV) change. Secondary outcomes included ventricular structure and function parameters, for example, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, LVEF, etc. RESULTS: Among 67…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free