Evidence Hub

Calcium channel blockers increase the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection

Ma T, Cai Z, Xu X, Cao L, Wang A, Zhang Z, Zhang S, Huang Z et al.

Nature communications, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Aortic aneurysm and dissection (AAD) are life-threatening conditions without effective medications. Impaired contractility of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) is strongly linked to AAD, but the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), which directly inhibits VSMC contractility, in AAD remains unclear. Here we showed data from 501,878 initially AAD-free participants in UK Biobank. Over a median follow-up of 13.5 years, CCB users had higher AAD risk (HR = 1.31) than hypertensive patients not receiving antihypertensive treatment. In mouse models of AAD, CCBs significantly aggravated aortic stiffness and AAD development. For patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent endovascular repair, CCBs limited AAD regression compared with other antihypertensives. Moreover, silencing of protein kinase cGMP-dependent 1 (PRKG1) significantly mitigated CCB-aggravated AAD progression. These findings suggest that CCBs may increase AAD risk and post-stent surgery prognosis, highlighting the need for caution when prescribing CCBs to hypertensive patients at risk for AAD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free