Evidence Hub

Non-linear saturation threshold of gonadotropin dose on cumulative live birth rates in advanced-age women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

Han Y, Wei C, Wang X, Zhang J

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

2,449 participants

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a leading cause of anovulatory infertility. Despite a high antral follicle count, advanced-age PCOS patients experience a marked decline in cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) after assisted reproductive technology. The dose-response relationship between total gonadotropin (Gn) dose and CLBR in this population remains poorly defined. This study aimed to quantify the non-linear threshold effect of total Gn dose, characterize the endometrial thickness (EMT) dose-response relationship, and develop a predictive nomogram.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2449 PCOS patients stratified by age quartiles. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of CLBR for the entire cohort and the advanced-age subgroup (≥35 years). For the advanced-age group, restricted cubic splines (RCS) evaluated non-linear associations between total Gn dose and CLBR; piecewise linear regression identified saturation thresholds. RCS and conditional marginal effects analyzed EMT-CLBR relationships. A nomogram was constructed from multivariable predictors and validated internally with 1000 bootstrap resamples. Model performance was assessed via AUC-ROC, calibration curves, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis.

Results: CLBR was significantly lower in the advanced-age group (44.40%) than in younger cohorts (63.90%-69.40%, P P = 0.019), with saturation at 1, 600 IU. Below this threshold, each 100-IU increase…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,449 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free