Evidence Hub

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Icosapent Ethyl by Baseline Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Secondary Analysis of the REDUCE‐IT Randomized Trial

Rahul Aggarwal, Deepak L. Bhatt, P. Steg, Michael Miller, E. Brinton, R. Dunbar, S. Ketchum, J. Tardif et al.

Journal of the American Heart Association : Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2025

8,175 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Background The efficacy of icosapent ethyl among patients with very well‐controlled baseline low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) is unknown. Methods In this post hoc analysis of the REDUCE‐IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial) randomized clinical trial, statin‐treated patients with high cardiovascular risk, elevated triglycerides (135–499 mg/dL), and baseline LDL‐C of 41 to 100 mg/dL were included. Patients were randomized to icosapent ethyl (2 g twice daily) or placebo and then post hoc stratified by baseline LDL‐C (<55 mg/dL versus ≥55 mg/dL). The primary composite end point included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina. Results Among 8175 patients with baseline LDL‐C data, 7117 (87.1%) had LDL‐C ≥55 mg/dL and 1058 (12.9%) had LDL‐C <55 mg/dL. In patients with LDL‐C <55 mg/dL, the rate of the primary composite end point was lower in the icosapent ethyl group (16.2% versus 22.8%) than in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.50–0.87]; absolute risk reduction, 6.6%; P=0.003). Among patients with LDL‐C ≥55 mg/dL, a primary composite end point event occurred in a lower proportion of patients in the icosapent ethyl group (17.4% versus 21.9%) than in the placebo group (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69–0.85]; absolute risk reduction, 4.5%; P<0.0001). No significant interaction was observed between baseline LDL‐C and treatment group (P for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 8,175 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free