Evidence Hub

Changes in physical activity during a one-year weight loss trial with liraglutide vs placebo in participants with knee osteoarthritis: Secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial

C. Bartholdy, A. Overgaard, H. Gudbergsen, H. Bliddal, L. Kristensen, M. Henriksen

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2022

135 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess if a change in physical activity occurred after a one-year weight loss period on either liraglutide or placebo in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight. Method This is secondary analysis of a one-year weight loss trial, with participants randomised (1:1) to either liraglutide 3 mg/day or placebo. The main outcome was change in physical activity (min/day) after one year assessed by accelerometer. Physical function was assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), function subscale with 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating extreme disability. Analyses were done on the modified intention to treat population defined as complete baseline accelerometer data. Results A total of 135 participants were analysed (66 liraglutide; 69 placebo). Daily physical activity time did not change in either group (liraglutide: 15.8 min/day; placebo: 14.2 min/day; mean difference 1.6 min/day (95%CI -16 to 19; P = 0.90)). The liraglutide group lost −4.1 kg more than placebo (95% CI -6.0 to −2.1; P < 0.0001) and improved in KOOS function 3.8 points more than placebo (95% CI 0.9 to 6.7; P = 0.01). Conclusion Despite better outcomes on body weight and self-reported physical functioning liraglutide did not induce changes in physical activity over one year in individuals with knee OA.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 135 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free