Evidence Hub

Kidney and Cardiovascular Effects of Canagliflozin According to Age and Sex: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CREDENCE Randomized Clinical Trial

T. Yi, B. Smyth, G. D. Di Tanna, C. Arnott, Kathryn Cardoza, A. Kang, C. Pollock, R. Agarwal et al.

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2023

31 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

It is unclear whether the effect of canagliflozin on adverse kidney and cardiovascular events in those with diabetic kidney disease varies by age and sex. We assessed the effects of canagliflozin among age group categories and between sexes in the CREDENCE study.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Participants in the CREDENCE trial.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to canagliflozin 100 mg daily or placebo.

OUTCOMES

Primary composite outcome of kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine, or death due to kidney or cardiovascular disease. Pre-specified secondary and safety outcomes were also analyzed. Outcomes were evaluated by age at baseline (<60, 60-69, and ≥70 years) and sex in the intention-to-treat population using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 63.0±9.2 years and 34% were female. Older age and female sex were independently associated with a lower risk of the composite of adverse kidney outcomes. There was no evidence that the effect of canagliflozin on the primary outcome (a composite of kidney failure, a doubling of the serum creatinine, or death from kidney or cardiovascular causes) differed between age groups (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.87; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.82; and HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.29; for the <60, 60-69, and ≥70 year groups, respectively; Pinteraction=0.3); or among females and males (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.95; and HR 0.69,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free