Evidence Hub

A Modified Endoscopic Primary Realignment of Severe Bulbar Urethral Injury

Zhang Z, Fang L, Chen D, Li W, Peng N, Thakker PU, Zhang Y, Wang X

Journal of endourology, 2021

15 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Male urethral injury is a common urologic emergency in developing countries. Whether early or late treatment of urethral injuries is often multifactorial and controversial. The goal of this study is to determine whether early realignment can reduce postsurgical complications and evaluate the clinical feasibility of emergency endoscopic urethroplasty using single rigid ureteroscopy in the treatment of bulbar urethral severe injury. Patients and Methods: Between September 2013 and March 2019, 15 male adult patients (mean age 35 years; from 21 to 62 years) with severe bulbar urethral injury were enrolled into the current study. The patients mainly presented with dysuria or painful urination (15/15, 100%), urethral bleeding (13/15, 86.7%), and urinary retention (11/15, 73.3%). Six of them had swelling of perineal or scrotal soft tissue, while four had testicular contusion. No pelvic fracture was found in all cases with CT scanning of the pelvic cavity. The bulbar urethral at grade IV was confirmed to be completely ruptured in all cases by endoscopy during operation. The modified endoscopic primary realignment was performed. Results: This new urethral repair technique was effectively performed in all patients and none converted to open operation. Mean operation time was 42.3 ± 11.5 minutes (28-52 minutes) and the mean Foley catheter indwelling time was 34.5 ± 6.9 days (28-42 days). During a follow-up of 41.3 ± 22.8 months (12-64 months), mild urethral strictures (grade…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free