Evidence Hub

Anaemia predicts iron homoeostasis dysregulation and modulates the response to empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the EMPATROPISM-FE trial

Angermann CE, Sehner S, Gerhardt LMS, Santos-Gallego CG, Requena-Ibanez JA, Zeller T, Maack C, Sanz J et al.

European heart journal, 2025

80 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) impact iron metabolism in patients with heart failure but mechanisms are incompletely understood. This post hoc analysis explored interrelations between iron homeostasis, cardiac structure/function, exercise capacity, haematopoiesis, and sympathetic activity at baseline, and the effects of 6-month treatment with empagliflozin vs. placebo by anaemia status in EMPATROPISM-FE study participants.

METHODS: Myocardial iron content (MIC, estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance T2* imaging), left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV ejection fraction (LVEF), exercise capacity, laboratory iron markers (LIM), haemoglobin/haematocrit, erythropoietin, and plasma norepinephrine were determined at baseline and 6 months.

RESULTS: At baseline, 24/80 participants (30%) had anaemia (haemoglobin .10). Empagliflozin increased MIC (P < .012), improved exercise capacity, and activated haematopoiesis. Changes in LIM and norepinephrine suggested progressive systemic iron depletion and sympatholysis. LV reverse remodelling was greater in individuals with anaemia.

CONCLUSIONS: Dysregulated cellular iron uptake/availability may be a shared mechanism in myocardial structural/functional impairment, reduced exercise capacity, and restricted haematopoiesis in heart failure, which are worse in patients with anaemia, and improve with empagliflozin. Empagliflozin increases MIC and decreases norepinephrine. Given this inverse association,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free