Evidence Hub

Comparative effects of Imeglimin and empagliflozin on the redox-inflammation-organ stress axis in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Toshiki Otoda, Akiko Sekine, Ryoko Uemoto, Taiki Hori, Tomoyo Hara, Motoyuki Tamaki, Shingen Nakamura, T. Yuasa et al.

Discover Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2025

42 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Oxidative stress and inflammation contribute to diabetes-related organ damage beyond hyperglycemia. Imeglimin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors may modulate redox balance through distinct mitochondrial pathways, but their comparative effects on organ-level stress remain unclear. To compare the effects of imeglimin and empagliflozin on oxidative stress, inflammation, and subclinical organ stress markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this 24-week, prospective, randomized, open-label study, people with T2DM received imeglimin (n = 34) or empagliflozin (n = 42). Changes in urinary 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (u8-OHdG) and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) were assessed as co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included serum diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROM), biological antioxidant potential (BAP), serum 8-OHdG (s8-OHdG), tumor necrosis factor receptors 1/2 (TNFR1/2), and organ stress markers: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). u8-OHdG levels increased significantly, while L-FABP levels were not significantly changed at 24 weeks, suggesting a systemic rather than renal oxidative response. Only empagliflozin improved FIB-4, NT-proBNP, and CAVI values. Both treatments reduced TNFR1/2 values and increased BAP values. In the empagliflozin group, univariate analysis showed that ΔFIB-4 was positively correlated with ΔTNFR1 and ΔTNFR2, while ΔNT-proBNP and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 42 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free