Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Adding Empagliflozin to Liraglutide on Renal Function in Patients with Advanced-Stage Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kae Sunagawa, Keiji Hirai, S. Sunagawa, N. Kamiya, I. Komesu, Yusako Sunagawa, Hiroshi Sunagawa, Ken Nakachi et al.

Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity : Targets and Therapy, 2024

21 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the additional effects of empagliflozin on liraglutide in patients with advanced-stage type 2 diabetic kidney disease. Patients and Methods Forty-one patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with liraglutide alone during the first 6 months and subsequent treatment with liraglutide plus empagliflozin during the next 6 months (liraglutide plus empagliflozin group) (n = 20) or treatment with liraglutide alone for 12 months (liraglutide group) (n = 21). Liraglutide was administered subcutaneously once daily at a starting dose of 0.3 mg/day and up-titrated weekly by 0.3 mg to a maximum dose of 0.9 mg/day. Empagliflozin was administered orally at a dose of 10 mg once daily. The primary outcome was the change in renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) during the latter 6 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in body weight, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, uric acid, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and urine protein creatinine ratio during the latter 6 months. Results Empagliflozin significantly increased the hemoglobin concentration (from 12.9 ± 1.9 to 13.7 ± 1.9 g/dL; p<0.05) and decreased body weight (from 66.1 ± 12.9 to 64.5 ± 12.6 kg; p<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the groups for estimated glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free