Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil in patients with systemic scleroderma

Alekperov RT, Ananyeva LP, Korzeneva EG, Cheremukhina EO

Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 2013

16 participants

Abstract

AIM: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of sildenafil (Sf) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SS).

SUBJECTS AND RESULTS: Sf was used in 16 patients (including 14 women) aged 20-66 years (mean 48.6 +/- 14.6 years; median 51.5 years) with SS of a duration of 2 months to 27 years (mean 8.8 +/- 7.3 years; median 6.5 years). The indications for Sf treatment were significant Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in 3 patients, digital ulcers (DU) and/or necroses (N) in 9, pulmonary hypertension (PH) in 5 (2 patients had PH concurrent with DU/N), and critical ischemia of the left fingers in 1 patient. RP was seen in all the patients and so the effect of Sf on the course of RP was evaluated in the whole patient group.

RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the frequency and intensity of Raynaud's attacks in 11 (73%) of the 15 patients treated with Sf. This effect was obvious just in the first days of Sf treatment and remained stable throughout the treatment. No RP changes were seen in 3 patients. All 7 patients with DUs showed a decrease in their sizes just within the first two weeks of treatment. Complete DU healing was observed within 4-12 weeks of treatment. During a month, the necrotic area reduced and the signs of reparation appeared in 4 of the 6 patients. Pain ceased just within the first 5-7 days of treatment. Sf resulted in a rapid reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP); in one case the latter diminished from 60 to 40 mm Hg just 90 min after the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free