Evidence Hub

Clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in a multi-racial population in Singapore: A retrospective study of 1520 patients

Lim PH, Li MK, Ng FC, Chia SJ, Consigliere D, Gooren L, Ng KK, Munisamy M et al.

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2002

912 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil citrate (Viagra), a selective inhibitor of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type-5, has been used as an oral therapeutic drug for erectile dysfunction. The present paper is a clinical study of the success rate and side-effects of the use of sildenafil in a multi-racial population in Singapore.

METHODS: From April 1999 to May 2000, 1520 patients were given sildenafil citrate. Of these, 912 patients (mean age, 54.6 years; age range, 22-99 years) were followed up and evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety of the drug. The mean duration of erectile dysfunction (ED) and follow-up periods were 31.5 and 3.0 months, respectively.

RESULTS: Satisfactory erections assessed by single global efficacy question (GEQ) occurred in 83% of patients, major side-effects in the form of flushing (3.48%), headache (1.97%), blurred vision (1.25%), giddiness (1.18%), warmth (1.11%) and others (4.92%) were recorded in 127 patients (13.9%). Racially, Chinese men with ED had higher efficacy (85.7%), compared to Indian men (74.2%) and Malay men (72.8%). With respect to comorbid profiles, an efficacy of 77.8% (n = 271), 83.9% (n = 292), 86.4% (n = 44) and 83.3% (n = 199) was recorded in diabetic, hypertensive, ischemic heart disease patients and in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, respectively. Patients who smoked (n = 135) and drank alcohol (n = 118) showed an efficacy of 80%. Baseline hormonal profiles of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 912 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free