Evidence Hub

The Role of Adding Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant to the Standard Management of Serpiginous Choroiditis for Achieving Rapid Remission: A Case Report

Almoayad Makrami, Yazeed Alhaqbani, Dhoha M Alhamad, Talaat J. Hamdi, Abdulaziz S Khoshaim

International Medical Case Reports Journal, 2025

Abstract

Background This case highlights the potential of combining intravitreal dexamethasone implants as first line of management with reduced dose of systemic steroid therapy to achieve rapid remission in acute serpiginous choroiditis. To prevent systemic adverse effects and obtain rapid control of serpiginous lesions, as necessary in the case presented, local therapy using a dexamethasone intravitreal implant may be considered as a complement to systemic treatment. Case Presentation A 42 year old woman with steadily declining vision in her right eye for the previous four months presented to the emergency department. On the Snellen chart, the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/28 in the left eye and 20/100 in the right eye. The intraocular pressure (IOP) of the right and left eyes was 15 and 16 mmHg, respectively. Anterior segment examination was unremarkable. Fundus examination of the right eye revealed a gray finger-like lesion with an active border. The left eye showed a small yellowish-finger-like lesion involving the nasal macula. Disruption in the ellipsoid zone in the right eye and the parafoveal region in the left eye was demonstrated using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed bilateral, finger-like branching lesions were seen on fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) showed hypoautofluorescence lesions with hyper-autofluorescence edges. Both eyes were diagnosed with active serpiginous choroiditis, after…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free