Evidence Hub

Short Mediterranean diet screener detects risk of prediabetes in Taiwan, a cross-sectional study

Yi-Cheng Hou, Jui-Yu Li, Jiann-Hwa Chen, Jong-Kai Hsiao, Jing-Hui Wu

Scientific Reports, 2023

346 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether the 14-item Mediterranean diet adherence screener (MEDAS) is suitable in Taiwan and associate the MEDAS score with the risk of prediabetes. In this cross-sectional study 346 patients were recruited between 2014 and 2019 at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital. The MEDAS score was obtained with a 14-item MEDAS used in the PREDIMED trial. The blood glucose level is measured by fasting glucose and HbA_1c. The results of the screener were analyzed for internal consistency and compared with the blood glucose level using multivariate regression models. The MEDAS score was significantly (p = 0.001) and inversely associated with both measures of blood glucose level. Adjusted data (95% CI) showed that each additional point in the MEDAS score decreases the risk of prediabetes with abnormal fasting glucose (> 100 mg/dL) level by 60% and the risk of prediabetes with abnormal HbA_1c (> 5.7%) by 22.4%. Consuming at least 3 servings of legumes each week was significantly (p = 0.007) related to a lower risk of prediabetes under logistic regression. A higher score on the 14-item MEDAS screener was significantly associated with a lower risk of prediabetes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 346 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free