Evidence Hub

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Hemodynamic Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk (the SIMPLE Trial)

E. Wolsk, Mikkel Jürgens, M. Schou, M. Ersbøll, P. Hasbak, A. Kjær, B. Zerahn, Niels Høgh Brandt et al.

Diabetes, 2022

34 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Treatment with the sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) empagliflozin significantly reduces cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), however the mechanisms behind the reduction in cardiovascular (CV) events are unknown. We sought to investigate whether SGLT-2i treatment affected central hemodynamics during rest and exercise in 34 patients with diabetes in this investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary endpoint was change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at a submaximal ergometer workload (25 watt) after 13 weeks of SGLT-2i treatment (25 mg OD) compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included changes in resting hemodynamics. Baseline and follow-up hemodynamic assessment was performed at rest, submaximal (25 watt), and peak exercise using right heart catheterization. Treatment with empagliflozin for 13 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk did not reduce left heart filling pressure more than placebo at submaximal exercise. At rest, we observed that empagliflozin reduced PCWP at a magnitude of clinical significance.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 34 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free