Evidence Hub

Sotatercept in Pulmonary Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: A Case Series and Systematic Review

Chilingarashvili G, Mylvaganam RJ, Bernardo RJ, Shah A, Cuttica M, Roberts T, Marchetti N, Rali P

Pulmonary circulation, 2026

Abstract

Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH) frequently complicated by pulmonary hypertension (PH), which markedly worsens prognosis. We retrospectively reviewed three institutional PLCH-PH cases treated with off-label Sotatercept added to background triple therapy and performed a systematic review of published PLCH-PH reports (PubMed/Embase through May 2025). Our three patients (ages 69, 62, 49; all female) had progressive vascular disease despite optimized vasodilator therapy. Following Sotatercept, all experienced ≥ 3-fold increases in 6-min walk distance and improved functional class. Hemodynamics improved substantially: right-atrial pressure -78.6%, pulmonary vascular resistance -75.5%, pulmonary artery systolic pressure -58.5%, mean PAP - 56.0%, PA diastolic pressure -51.0%, PAWP - 47.1%; cardiac output and index rose +75.9% and +73.8%, respectively. BNP/NT-proBNP normalized. Systematic review identified 34 published cases (2010-2025): mean age 37.2 ± 13.7 years, 44.1% female, 45.7% current/former smokers. Reported management strategies included targeted vasodilators, cytotoxic PLCH therapies (e.g., cladribine), smoking cessation, and selective surgery/transplant. In this small series, Sotatercept added to background therapy produced marked clinical and hemodynamic gains in refractory PLCH-PH. These effects of Sotatercept in Group 5 PH-are encouraging but limited by sample size and retrospective design. Prospective, collaborative studies are needed to define safety,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free